Harper and the American Manifest
Destiny
This just in:
Mergers and Acquisitions (and other
economic disappointments) of Canada’s
best companies was booming
last week.
Our
hi-tech firms just U.S.
farm teams?
Markham jewel
latest acquisition. Lack
of
investment support blamed.
Tyler Hamilton,
Jul. 25, 2006
CPR
chief pooh-poohs takeover rumours
Brent Jang
Globe and
Mail Update, 25/07/06
Canada
wins softwood lumber case in U.S.
court (disputed once again)
Last
Updated Fri, 21 Jul 2006
The
Canadian Press
BFGoodrich
closing tire factory in Kitchener
1,100-employees
face job loss
Canadian
Press
Published:
Thursday, February 02, 2006
Canadians (the
people) have always resisted American incursions, militarily,
philosophically
and economically, in our sovereign affairs. Though for some mysterious
reason
there are times that the Canadian government has opened its arms to
encroaching
“Integration”, more
often than not
in the last 20 years and more deceivingly, if not completely invisible,
to the
Canadian public.
Mulroney
primarily, Chretien, Martin and Thomas d'Aquino, Chief Executive and
President of
the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, all share complicity to a
large
degree in this drift by either lying, reneging and/or trying to sneek
through
legislation that Canadians never gave them a mandate to. In this
article I am
referring to the 'Mulroney Free Trade Debacle' (FTA), NAFTA, Deep
Integration and the
‘boiling
frog’ technique to stew us. They try to not only sell us the hot tub to
luxuriate in, they extol the virtues of this pot as they very gradually
turn up
the temperature until we find we are cooked.
Having just
finished reading “The
Fight for Canada”
by David Orchard (check it out!) it was news to me that the Canadian
history I
was taught in grade school was far more than limited to the Battle of
1812. I
exaggerate of course but I must admit that paying attention to history
was
pretty far from my mind, well, others things mattered way back then. I
do
remember the early French explorers, Cartier, Champlain (French),
Hudsons Bay
Company (English), General Wolfe (hero) and Montcalm (defeated), Louis
Riel
(Metis traitor hanged) Brebeuf (missionary murdered and skinned alive
by Indians). All
else in
later grades Canadian history was second to British history, European
history
and American history (where Manifest Destiny
was revealed to me). (Comments in brackets are what I was
led to believe.)
The book by
David Orchard, “The Fight for Canada”,
resurrected from my subconscious, or genetic memory (?), a Canadian
history to
be proud of, for the most part, and particularly our successes in
defending our
distinct Canadian values derived from survival through co-operation
(for the
most part), when the "chips were down", as opposed to survival by
genocide and
theft. As such, I have revised my grade school notions of Canada’s
past.
With
courage, cunning and respect amongst the compatriot-allies, English,
French and
other multinational Canadians, First Nations and the British, Canada
was defended from the
American obsession with Manifest
Destiny.
This is
what I read and knew in my Canadian bones that I was proud of:
“If
“manifest destiny” is to be stopped, it will
have to be done where
it has been done before: in 1690, at the rock of Quebec
(Count Frontenac) ; in 1775, under the battlements of that
same city (Guy Carleton); in 1812/13,
on the battlefields of Queenston Heights (Tecumseh,
Isaac Brock, Laura Secord) and Chateauguay (de
Salaberry, First Nations); in 1864 in Charlottetown (Thomas
D'Arcy McGee, Sir John A. Macdonald,
Sir Georges-Etienne Cartier, George Brown and so many more ‘fathers’);
in
1870, on the plains south of Winnipeg (Louis
Riel and Gabriel Dumont); in 1871, in British Columbia (De
Cosmos); and in 1949, in Newfoundland (Smallwood).
When the chips were down Canadians never failed the
test of history. The chips are down today.”
-
The Fight
for Canada
p.243
(italics mine)
“At so many other critical times in Canadian
history, a remarkable
individual had emerged.”
-
ibid
p.110
So what
happened after Smallwood?
The big
slide seemed to start at the end of the 1970’s with the neo-con
ascendancy of Margaret Thatcher, PM of Britain (1979 -1990) ,
not to mention being preceded one year by “Dallas”,
the TV series (1978 - 1991) to get us in the ‘mood’.
But, for
the most part, the common thread is during the period of the 80’s and
90’s.
Thatcher was on a roll in the early 80’s and so was “Dallas”, the most successful American
soap
opera in the world. On the heels of this trend to economic growth,
conspicuous
consumption, pursuit of wealth and happiness, was the American Dream
come true
- two times over, a Hollywood movie star and President of the United
States, Ronald Reagan ((1981 – 1989),
famous for financing Bin Laden and the Afgan mujahadeen, Reagan’s
“freedom
fighters”, and ultimately bankrupting the USSR ending the Cold War. The
TV
series “Dynasty” (1981 - 1989) jumped on
the lucrative bandwagon and bloated the national economy – buy, buy,
buy debt
is cool! And if that was not to beat all Canada got Brian Mulroney
(1984 – 1993) and the
TV
series, “Lifestyles of
the Rich and
Famous” (1984 – 1995) in the
same year!! Is there no end to this
neo-con dream?
It is also
important to keep in mind that there were some ‘redeeming’ (sarcasm)
qualities
to this period I call, “The Age of
Excellence”, initiated by a book, “In
Search of Excellence” an
international bestselling book written by Tom Peters and Robert H.
Waterman Jr,
first published in 1982. Wall Street/Harvard
Business School seemed to interpret the message of excellence in
balance sheets
and bottom lines, heralding in the epoch of the ‘excellence
of the leanest and meanest’. Interestingly enough the
book was based on false data, He (Tom Peters) is quoted as saying,
"This
is pretty small beer, but for what it's worth, okay, I confess: We
faked the
data." (click the Wiki link for more of this curious behaviour). Seems
like ‘excellence’ was devolving into shady ethical regions. Signs of
more to
come: Enron, Worldcom, and other corporate
scandals.
Alas, back
in Canada, the
Mulroney/Campbell
Conservatives finally succumbed to a woken up Canada,
Trudeau was making much
influential noise in his retirement to whom Canadians still turned to.
In 1993 and
his/her (actually Mulroney retired, plummeting in the polls, and left
to Kim
Campbell to make the best of a looming disaster) government was
humiliatingly
thrown out of office with only 2 members surviving of 295 parliamentary
seats. The
following governments, Liberals under Chretien (and later Martin) were
‘saviours’ to a desperate public clamouring to get out of this FTA and GST as had been promised in the famous
Liberal
”Red Book”.
Another
interesting event in 1993, George H.W. Bush was voted out and Bill
Clinton came
to power. Had North America had
enough
right-of-centre Conservatism? Not really, part of it went underground
and
distilled into Neo Conservatism and the other part morphed into the
Liberals. Clinton
disgraced himself
with Monica and several years after that, Chretien disgraced the
Liberals with Harper
making an incredible noise about Ad Scam and Liberal corruption. I
don’t know
if Martin was disgraced but it seems he did nothing to disgrace himself
except
by almost submitting to Bush’s version
of American Manifest Destiny. Canadians still had the courage
to oppose its
government and he backed down much to Bush’s disgust. Nevertheless we
were sick
of the corrupt Liberals and were angry enough to risk teaching them a
lesson –
a minority government of Harper's neo-con conservatives. Now
we are
out of the territory that is covered in “The Fight for Canada” and I
would
highly recommend it to all before Harper finds a good excuse to get his
Conservatives (Note: emphasis on the “his” as he does
the talking and not his ministers) a majority
government.
To give him
his due, He stands head above shoulders in laying out his goals and
taking
action on them. He means what he says and then more so, he means what
he isn’t
saying. He reminds me of Mike Harris out-kleining Ralph
Klein, and Reagan out-thatchering
Thatcher and given Harper’s current unique global profile, he has
achieved a
reputation of “out-bushing Bush”!
PM's
pro-Israeli tilt could cost him at polls
- But Harper is "out-bushing
Bush," as Opposition Leader Bill Graham says. Whereas several G8
leaders
thought of the Israeli bombardment of Lebanon as outrageously
disproportionate, Harper found it "measured."
- A Canadian prime minister
thus did
not utter a word of protest against the killing of eight Canadians, let
alone
of nearly 300 other people and the displacement of about 500,000
civilians and
the destruction of civilian infrastructure
Haroon Siddiqui, Jul.
20, 2006
rabble.ca
The man is re-defining the
power of minority government! It is truly remarkable what he says he’s
going to
do! And the scariest part is that there is no one on the radar that
will stand
up to him!
Remember
when Trudeau made the statement, “Just watch me.” when he refused to yield to the
FLQ demands in the October Crisis? Well at least he represented a
majority of
Canadians and his feisty leadership style was something he was born
with. You
either loved him or hated him. Alberta,
Big Oil and the Republican Americans hated him but the rest of us loved
him. He
had magic.
Harper mirrors
this attitude towards his opponents but is not concerned with
“annoying
certain segments of the
population”. He also had image consultants and a ‘makeover’ to
sell him to
the public, also a majority of Canadians didn’t vote for him (“certain
segments” = 63%) and then this stunning Rambo attitude makes you wonder
how he
can say what he says and does. His bravado is backed by something as
yet
unseen, though I expect it is Bush. Rex Harper has recently described
Harper
as:
He
is, in his personal demeanour,
reserved, formal, polite, studious. Almost, in fact, a classic nerd.
His
personality, insofar as he allows himself to project one in public, is
low key
to the point of being indistinct. Allow me to tantalize those with long
memories: Stephen Harper is more Earl Cameron than Douglas Fairbanks
-
Rex Murphy, theglobeandmail .com, July 22/06
I think
Harper went overboard, either that or he shares a telephone booth with
Clark Kent. I still
have hope though. Once again I’ll repeat a quote from Orchard’s book:
“At so many other critical times in
Canadian history, a remarkable
individual had emerged.”
-
ibid
p.110
We have
pulled together before with great leaders such as, Frontenac, Carleton,
Tecumseh, Brock, Secord, de Salaberry, First Nations, D'Arcy McGee,
Macdonald, Cartier,
Brown, Riel, Dumont, De Cosmos,
Smallwood and
thousands of others. And no matter what we decide to do there will
always be
consequences, and even if we stick our heads in the sands there will
always be
consequences. Canada is still a land of an abundance of
natural resources and we are known as a fair generous people and let us
accept
the consequences of ensuring our own future and not let others create
fear, insecurity and decisions for us. We have no less to fear than
other courageous and less
advantaged nations who are willing and able to stand up for themselves
and
discover that the consequences were not as dire as others and their own
leaders would have them believe.
Harper says he is "Standing up for Canada" but he is
not standing up for most
of Canada’s
people, he is standing up for someone else. If a majority of us stood
up for
ourselves, once again we would be a nation deserving of it’s good name
in the world. Have no doubt that the consequences will be very
difficult but I'll leave this with the Dalai Lama from his book "Ethics for
the New Millenium":
"It is also worth remembering that the time
of greatest gain in terms of wisdom and inner strength is often that of
greatest difficulty. With the right approach - and here we see once
more the supreme importance of developing a positive attitude - the
experience of suffering can open our eyes to reality.
- p.139
Let us hope that when Harper rolls out the 'red carpet' for His
Holiness he can hear above the noise of conflict.
Links:
The Fight for Canada by David Orchard
http://www.davidorchard.com/online/2do-index.html
Ethics for a New
Millenium by His Holiness the Dalai Lama
http://www.tibet.ca/en/wtnarchive/1999/9/13_4.html
A change in emphasis
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&call_pageid=971358637177&c=Article&cid=1153566043901
Harper's
approach, he says, has been very different: more personal, more
aggressive,
more ideological, less nuanced.
"What
this suggests is a real revolution in the way foreign policy is
conducted," he says. Nossal sees
the shift as significant.
"Harper
is willing to take a steely-eyed view and not
worry about annoying certain segments of the population," he says.
"His first eye isn't on risk avoidance."
Bush sneaking North American
super-state
without oversight?
Mexico, Canada partnership underway with no
authorization from Congress
by Jerome
R. Corsi
June 17,
2006
WorldNetDaily.com
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=COR20060617&articleId=2663
Manifest
Destiny
From
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest_Destiny
Thinking
the unthinkable about Canada’s
future
by Geoff
Olson, July 19, 2006
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=OLS20060719&articleId=2761
Manifest
Destiny - America
the New Israel
http://gbgm-umc.org/UMW/Joshua/manifest.html
-
The
Joshua Website
http://gbgm-umc.org/UMW/Joshua/joshua3.stm
This page
is an excerpt from Joshua and the Promised Land
copyright ©
Roy H. May, Jr
Exceptional
Americans Manifest Their Destiny:
And to Hell with the Consequences...
by Jason
Miller
June 20,
2006
GlobalResearch.ca
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=MIL20060620&articleId=2677
A pattern
emerges….
Afghanistan and Iraq
are not aberrations in United States foreign
policy. Bush and his Neocons
are not “a few bad apples”. They may be more malevolent than their
predecessors, but they are not the first to advance American corporate
and
plutocratic interests through lies, propaganda, invasion, and flagrant
crimes
against humanity. America’s
socioeconomic system has engendered and reinforced such pathological
behavior
for years.
Stephen Harper: A photo-op too far
http://rabble.ca/everyones_a_critic.shtml?sh_itm=05fb2324b649ccfa1ac3362ca04ca3a9&rXn=1&
PM's pro-Israeli tilt
could cost him at polls
Jul. 20, 2006. 01:00 AM
HAROON SIDDIQUI
Finally,
the struggle to keep Canada's
voice distinct and separate from that of the United States is bred in
our bones.
But Harper
is "out-bushing Bush," as Opposition Leader Bill Graham says. Whereas
several G8 leaders thought of the Israeli bombardment of Lebanon as
outrageously disproportionate, Harper found it "measured."
A Canadian
prime minister thus did not utter a word of protest against the killing
of
eight Canadians, let alone of nearly 300 other people and the
displacement of
about 500,000 civilians and the destruction of civilian infrastructure.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Thatcher
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dallas_(TV_series).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynasty_(TV_series)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mulroney
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifestyles_of_the_Rich_and_Famous
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_Search_of_Excellence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_abuse
Back
to Thoughts from the Cauldron